Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael Williams's avatar

I agree with much of the article, however I believe running has its place. It’s the cardio modality that requires the least coordination, equipment and planning to execute — simply put on some running shoes and go. I joined the army when the ACFT was being rolled out so I haven’t personally experienced the runners cult you described but I believe it exists. Despite this, I think the average soldier would be in better conditioning and overall health with more cardio, not less. Additionally, while cross training with implements such as the assault bike undoubtedly is beneficial and will lead to improvements in anaerobic/aerobic capacity, the principle of specificity still applies. The most efficient way to get better at running (and combat tasks like sprinting from cover to cover) is to run and sprint. At the end of the day, soldiers will be spending time and maneuvering on their feet. I think implementing smarter cardio programming (specifically a more polarized approach, HIIT and easy runs) in addition to more METCONs and cross training like you described in the article would be best.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts